Production, process and systems of production are vitally important elements to any product, business or economy. Can we make something in such a way that our inputs to the end output are (a) profitable and (b) sustainable? Well, we’ve certainly solved for (a) – but, as our world economy is steadily using up all of our planet’s resources, the need for us to solve for (b), across the board and in every industry, couldn’t be more pressing.
In our favornomics work and research, we will be exploring systems of production, process efficiency and materials as inputs to commercialized outputs. But with favornomics, our focus will be on exploring the efficiency of human energy as a process input that is used to create the output.
We will start our journey here with a brief overview of the circular economy.
As a caveat much of the content below is from the circular economy wiki page so as to provide standard, accepted definitions.
The circular economy is a generic term for an industrial economy that is, by design or intention, restorative and in which material flows are of two types, biological nutrients, designed to reenter the biosphere safely, and technical nutrients, which are designed to circulate at high quality without entering the biosphere.
After one look at this planet, any visitor from outer space would say “I want to see the manager.”
– William S. Burroughs
How far does the Circular Economy reach?
The term encompasses more than the production and consumption of goods and services, including a shift from fossil fuels to the use of renewable energy, and the role of diversity as a characteristic of resilient and productive systems. It includes discussion of the role of money and finance as part of the wider debate, and some of its pioneers have called for a revamp of economic performance measurement tools.
Origin of the Circular Economy
The circular economy is grounded in the study of feedback rich (non-linear) systems, particularly living systems. A major outcome of this is the notion of optimizing systems rather than components, or the notion of ‘design for fit’. As a generic notion it draws from a number of more specific approaches including cradle to cradle, biomimicry, industrial ecology, and the ‘blue economy’. Most frequently described as a framework for thinking, its supporters claim it is a coherent model that has value as part of a response to the end of the era of cheap oil and materials.
Linear “Take, Make, Dispose” industrial processes and the lifestyles that feed on them deplete finite reserves to create products that end up in landfills or in incinerators. This realization triggered the thought process of a few scientists and thinkers, including Walter R. Stahel, an architect, economist, and a founding father of industrial sustainability. Credited with having coined the expression “Cradle to Cradle” (in contrast with “Cradle to Grave”, illustrating our “Resource to Waste” way of functioning) in the late 1970s, Stahel worked on developing a “closed loop” approach to production processes, co-founding the Product-Life Institute in Geneva more than 25 years ago.
In their 1976 Hannah Reekman research report to the European Commission, “The Potential for Substituting Manpower for Energy”, Walter Stahel and Genevieve Reday sketched the vision of an economy in loops (or circular economy) and its impact on job creation, economic competitiveness, resource savings, and waste prevention. The report was published in 1982 as the book Jobs for Tomorrow: The Potential for Substituting Manpower for Energy.
Considered as one of the first pragmatic and credible sustainability think tanks, the main goals of Stahel’s institute are product-life extension, long-life goods, reconditioning activities, and waste prevention. It also insists on the importance of selling services rather than products, an idea referred to as the “functional service economy” and sometimes put under the wider notion of “performance economy” which also advocates “more localization of economic activity”.
In broader terms, the circular approach is a framework that takes insights from living systems. It considers that our systems should work like organisms, processing nutrients that can be fed back into the cycle—whether biological or technical—hence the “closed loop” or “regenerative” terms usually associated with it.
The generic Circular Economy label can be applied to, and claimed by, several different schools of thought, that all gravitate around the same basic principles which they have refined in different ways. The idea itself, which is centered on taking insights from living systems, is hardly a new one and hence cannot be traced back to one precise date or author, yet its practical applications to modern economic systems and industrial processes have gained momentum since the late 1970s, giving birth to four prominent movements, detailed below. The idea of circular material flows as a model for the economy was presented in 1966 by Kenneth E. Boulding in his paper, The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. Promoting a circular economy was identified as national policy in China’s 11th five-year plan starting in 2006. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, an independent charity established in 2010, has more recently outlined the economic opportunity of a circular economy. As part of its educational mission, the Foundation has worked to bring together complementary schools of thought and create a coherent framework, thus giving the concept a wide exposure and appeal.
The circular economy is about restorative process, productive systems and resource efficiency – and the relationship(s) between inputs/materials and their outputs.
At favornomics – a human-centered, human-powered marketplace/eco-system concept, our “inputs” or rather the inputs we care most about when looking at systems of production, process-design and the relationship of the materials used within them – is human-energy. People. How do our advances in technology and process-design impact us as people – our behavior, our time, our energy?
We will continue our conversation on the circular economy and various systems of production, here.
As favornomics continues to evolve, we are always looking for others to collaborate with us by sharing their wisdom and thoughts to help broaden our thinking.
Please go HERE if you’re interested in contributing to our newsletter and/or participating in a Global Advisory Role.